How Can the Transportation Planning Board Support Metro?

January 13th, 2016

Metro and the Transportation Planning Board (TPB) engaged in a wide ranging discussion with TPB board members about how the TPB and the region’s jurisdictions can support Metro now and in the future. Not surprisingly, there’s a lot more to it than just predictable funding.

At the December 16th Transportation Planning Board (TPB) meeting (audio), Metro Board Member Harriet Tregoning gave the final presentation (pdf) and facilitated a discussion on Metro’s challenges and provided specific recommendations and/or opportunities for the TPB and local jurisdictions to increase their support the Authority today, tomorrow, and into the future. The focus of the discussion was specifically on plans, processes, and actions that the TPB and local jurisdictions can modify or begin that will ensure predictable funding and/or enhanced funding options, incorporate land use as a transportation strategy, increase transit-supportive land use decisions, prioritize bike and pedestrian access, and advance bus priority on the streets that local jurisdictions operate.

Last summer, TPB members requested a more extensive conversation surrounding Metro’s challenges as well as recommendations on how TPB, through its plans and processes, and local jurisdictions, through their decisions and funding, could support Metro. Metro opted to provide three presentations and the December presentation built on information provided at the November 18th meeting (audio) on Metro Fundamentals (pdf) and Momentum (pdf) that were given  by Tom Webster, Managing Director of Metro’s Office of Management and Budget, and Shyam Kannan, Managing Director of Metro’s Office of Planning. The November presentations served to ensure a baseline understanding across TPB Board members, highlight our capital and operating challenges, and identify safety, state of good repair, and longer term needs to ensure safe, reliable transit that meets the growing region.

Below are the specific recommendations that WMATA provided to TPB.  The discussion was wide ranging and touched on transit-oriented development; bus priority; encouraging TPB as a regional body to have a conversation about what a predictable revenue source for Metro could look like (which is within TPB’s Vision and listed as Goal 7); advocating for Metro and regional transportation priorities at the local policy making boards, such as the city and county councils; and increasing coordination between jurisdictions and Metro on transit accessibility for disabled customers.

What do you think? Anything else you think is within TPB and/or local jurisdictions’ purview that could support Metro?

How Can TPB Support Metro: TPB Plans and Processes

How Can TPB Support Metro: TPB Plans and Processes

How Can Jurisdictions Support Metro: Specific Actions

How Can Jurisdictions Support Metro: Specific Actions

How Can Jurisdictions Support Metro: Funding

How Can Jurisdictions Support Metro: Funding

 

 

Related Posts:

Comments are closed.